The Supreme Court has issued a unanimous ruling that will be a tremendous help as the Trump administration seeks to remove millions of illegal aliens. The high court has ruled that no lower federal courts can review an executive branch agency’s decision to revoke an immigration visa. If the Department of Homeland Security decides to tell a visa holder to GTFO (get the fudge out) because they’re a terrorist, that visa holder must GTFO and they get no appeal in the federal courts. This will help streamline the process of kicking all the dirty foreigners out.

The case was Bouarfa vs. Mayorkas, meaning Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. This will go down in history as one of the few Supreme Court cases that the Biden regime won. The reason is that for once, Mayorkas followed an immigration law passed by Congress and enforced it as an officer of the executive branch.

The law in the US has stated since the 1960s that if an immigrant or refugee commits immigration fraud at any point during their application process, they are to be deported. They can never again apply for entry into the US because if we’re going to allow immigrants into our country, they shouldn’t be the dirty fraudster types.

The problem is that the immigrants can always find a free Democrat lawyer who wants to remake the demographics of our country. They’ll appeal against the executive branch decision to a federal district court. If they lose that case, they’ll appeal to a federal appellate court. They’re basically rolling the dice and hoping that they’ll catch a liberal judge who will overturn the executive branch’s lawful deportation order. This happens a lot. As the process drags out, the immigrant fraudster gets to continue living on welfare in the US.

Doesn’t an immigration system that kicks out immigrants for committing immigration fraud make logical sense?

Here’s a completely hypothetical example. Suppose that a refugee from Somalia somehow gets elected to serve as the US Representative for the Fifth District in Minnesota. But she committed immigration fraud by marrying her own brother so he could get a visa and move to the US. Our hypothetical congresswoman then committed state and federal tax fraud. She filed her taxes as “married filing jointly” while in a sham marriage with her brother. She also fraudulently applied for student loans using her fake marital status.

The list of crimes that our hypothetical congresswoman committed includes immigration fraud, visa fraud, perjury, state and federal tax fraud, and student loan fraud. Shouldn’t a hypothetical refugee who provably committed that many crimes be automatically deported? (Okay, we’re actually talking about Rep. Ilhan Omar.)

In the current Supreme Court case, a non-citizen named Ala’a Hamayel was in the US on an immigration visa. She married a US citizen named Amina Bouarfa in 2015. In 2017 (when the Trump administration was in charge), the Department of Homeland Security learned that Hamayel had committed fraud previously by entering a sham marriage with an American. The DHS decided that it should never have allowed Hamayel to stay in the US after her first fraudulent marriage. Fraud is fraud and immigrants who commit fraud must GTFO. Here we are almost nine years later and this woman who doesn’t even deny that she committed immigration fraud to stay in the US is still here, still suing the government, and still clogging the court system up with her appeals.

The court ruled 9-0 that federal courts can no longer review executive branch decisions regarding immigration status. Now imagine what the next four years will look like with DHS, the Border Patrol, ICE, and every other executive branch agency working in tandem to kick all of Joe Biden’s illegal aliens out. There’s no longer an appeals process for them!